![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.vorspeisenplatte.de\/speisen\/archiv\/180717_01_St_Paul.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nund schell wieder sonnig und zackig warm wurde. Prompt protestierte mein Kreislauf, ich kam sehr wacklig nach Hause.<\/p>\n
Herr Kaltmamsell servierte Nudeln mit Tomatensugo Ernteanteil 2017 und aktueller Ernteanteil-Aubergine. Kurz vor der Tagesschau gewitterte und regnete es nochmal heftig.<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
Maria Furtw\u00e4ngler im Interview ein Jahr nach der Ver\u00f6ffentlichung der von ihr initiierten Studie \u00fcber den Frauenanteil im deutschen Film und Fernsehen, unter anderem dar\u00fcber, wie selbst diejenigen Frauen Frauendiskriminierung mittragen, die sie erkennen: \u00a7<\/p>\n Ein sehenswerter TED-Vortrag der nigerianischen Autorin Chimamanda Adichie von 2009: Niemand ist nur die eine Geschichte, in die wir ihn oder sie reflexartig einsortieren.<\/p>\n \u00a7<\/p>\n Sehr ausf\u00fchrlicher Artikel von Hugh Howey dar\u00fcber, warum die Gattung Mensch evolution\u00e4r ein solches Erfolgsmodell ist, \u00dcber unangenehme Erkenntnisse zum Funktionieren unseres Gehirns – und was das f\u00fcr K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz bedeutet: via @sixtus<\/a><\/p>\n The reason we haven\u2019t made self-conscious machines is primarily because we are in denial about what makes us self-conscious. The things that make us self-conscious aren\u2019t as flattering as the delusion of ego or the illusion of self-permanence. Self-consciousness isn\u2019t even very useful (which is why research into consciousness rarely goes anywhere\u2014it spends too much time assuming there\u2019s a grand purpose and then searching for it).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n (…)<\/p>\n Theory of Mind is the attempt by one brain to ascertain the contents of another brain. It is Sue wondering what in the world Juan is thinking. Sue creates theories about the current state of Juan\u2019s mind. She does this in order to guess what Juan might do next. If you think about it, no power could possibly be greater for a social and tribal animal like us humans.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n (…)<\/p>\n We might call it gossip, or socializing, but our brains consider this their main duty\u2014their primary function.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n (…)<\/p>\n To mimic human behavior, ignorance is key. As is the surety of initial guesses, or what we might call biases.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Daraus folgt unter anderem f\u00fcr die Programmierung autonomer Fahrzeuge:<\/p>\n Car manufacturers are busy at this very moment building vehicles that we would never call self-conscious. That\u2019s because they are being built too well. Our blueprint is to make a machine ignorant of its motivations while providing a running dialog of those motivations. A much better idea would be to build a machine that knows what other cars are doing. No guessing. And no running dialog at all.<\/p>\n That means access to the GPS unit, to the smartphone\u2019s texts, the home computer\u2019s emails. But also access to every other vehicle and all the city\u2019s sensor data. The Nissan tells the Ford that it\u2019s going to the mall. Every car knows what every other car is doing. There are no collisions. On the freeway, cars with similar destinations clump together, magnetic bumpers linking up, sharing a slipstream and halving the collective energy use of every car. The machines operate in concert. They display all the traits of vehicular omnipotence. They know everything they need to know, and with new data, they change their minds instantly. No bias.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u00a7<\/p>\n Irgendwie passt dazu dieser Ableger von WTF Evolution:<\/p>\n
\n“Ich habe am lautesten Blondinenwitze erz\u00e4hlt”.<\/a><\/p>\n
\n“The danger of a single story”.<\/a><\/p>\n
\n“How to Build a Self-Conscious Machine”.<\/a><\/p>\n
https:\/\/youtu.be\/mbnBYh-BJ1g<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n